Simply Green News and Entertainment

$100 Million From Private Sector To Save $350 Million In Health Care Costs


Vivi Gorman
Posted on Thursday 20th August 2009


Your rating: None Average: 5 (3 votes)


As the health care debate rages on in town hall meetings and on Capitol Hill, a private sector company, LED Saving Solutions, is focusing on cost containment by offering $100 million in LED lighting retrofits at zero out-of-pocket expense to over 100 hospitals and major hospital groups across the United States.

To date, energy efficiency has been largely left out of the health care debate even though 50 percent or more of a hospital’s electricity costs typically go toward lighting. LED (light emitting diode) lighting reduces electricity costs by 80 percent, which adds up to hundreds of millions of dollars of savings each year for health care.

In addition to energy efficiency, LED bulbs provide increased health and patient wellness where increased light quality is beneficial to patients and the productivity of the hospital staff. Furthermore, given that LED bulbs do not contain mercury, found in fluorescent bulbs, the benefit to the environment comes in the reduced chemical impact as well as the reduced carbon dioxide as the bulbs use far less energy.

In the past, the upfront retrofit expenses for the new generation of LED bulbs have been cost-prohibitive for hospitals. Through partnerships with more than seven major manufacturers, LED Saving Solutions is able to offer the $100 million LED lighting incentive to help make health care more affordable for Americans, at zero cost to patients and taxpayers. This offer extends to the first 100 hospitals that request up to $1 million in state-of-the-art lighting at zero out-of-pocket expense. The offer includes a free lighting energy audit and free retrofit bulb installation. LED Saving Solutions has forged production and financial partnerships that allow it to take on the initial cost of replacing the bulbs and will only get paid based on a portion of the savings generated each month, making the retrofit cash-flow positive for hospitals from the start.

Because hospitals typically operate 24 hours per day every day, a significantly larger portion of their energy consumption comes from lighting as compared with other commercial buildings. Since LED bulbs last between 50,000-70,000 hours, over the next 7 years the lighting retrofit will generate approximately $500,000 annual net cash-flow savings for each major hospital or hospital group that currently spends more than $1 million annually on lighting. The result is that a single participating hospital could save approximately $3.5 million; collectively, 100 participating hospitals stand to save more than $350 million.

Tax incentives and reduced maintenance costs of switching out bulbs also add to the bottom line in the first year and subsequent years. Based on a reduction of 10 lbs of CO2 emissions for $1 saved in electricity, the environmental benefit of saving $350 million in electric costs is equal to 3.5 billion lbs of greenhouse gases.

“Lighting accounts for about 20 percent to 30 percent of commercial electricity costs, but it is more than 50 percent of a typical hospital’s electricity costs, simply because the lights are often on 24 hours a day for the entirety of each year. So, LED lighting is a powerful scalpel in cutting out the escalating costs of operating a hospital.” - Charlie Szoradi LEED AP, President of LED Saving Solutions.

“Many of our hospital clients are moving toward mercury-free initiatives, and since these LED bulbs have no mercury we see this as one step toward reaching the goals. Since health care accounts for almost 20 percent of our national GNP, hospitals can lead the way for other industries,” Julie Becker, President of WHEN.org, Women’s Health & Environmental Network said. “Beyond the utility bill savings, energy efficiency reduces the greenhouse gases that have an adverse impact on public health. So, implementing smart LED technology can reduce health care costs over the long term as well as the short term.”

Posted on 21 August 2009 - 11:49am, by Mark Whitney (not verified).
While there are some very good LED lighting solutions out there, they are very few and far between. Many LED products on the market are not good efficiency alternatives at this time. T8 LED tubes, for instance, have been shown to be a poor application as documented by DOE's CALiPER testing program. I would be very cautious about installing LED products unless they have independent and documented performance ratings.
Posted on 22 August 2009 - 8:11am, by Rick Ferris (not verified).
5
I agree with Mark. There are many impostors in this LED market. I would venture to say that most led manufacturers and distributors in today's market are well under par. I've only seen a couple companies out there who certify their claims and actually back their products with long warranties. I found Grenentec to be the best company for those reasons. LED lights are really here and now if you work with the right company. My company just re-lamped our office with the LED T-8's from Grenentec and our manager said we're saving something like 60% on our lighting bills. Well, That's pretty phenomenal I'd say.
Posted on 25 August 2009 - 11:38am, by Mark Whitney (not verified).
Rick, you are missing my point. Any LED T8s right now are not a good T8 fluorescent retrofit option. They cost 10 times as much as a high-performance T8 lamp, depreciate 30% instead of 7%, do not have the light output of a T8 to begin with, and only last a little longer. Why would anyone choose an LED T8 over a high-performance T8? I wanted to check out the Grenentec website, but it is out of order at the moment. Again, LED T8s are not the solution they claim to be right now.
Posted on 7 September 2009 - 10:42am, by Rick Ferris (not verified).
I agree with you for some LED T-8 products. There are plenty of junk LED T-8's so you really have to be careful with what you purchase. There's a lot to weed through. You have to look at the companies with a good reputation for quality product & good warranty. Some LED T-8's out there are absolutely a great solution and actually live up to the claims. You have to look at them from the standpoint (if you find a good company w/ good product like Grenentec) that they use less than half the wattage, last almost twice as long, don't use ballasts, don't get hot, and they don't contain mercury or any other hazardous materials. All that being said... be careful with what you buy but they can be a great alternative.
Posted on 7 March 2010 - 1:53pm, by lance sterling (not verified).
How can i learn more about helping my clients (hotels, schools and hospitals) save on their lighting expense

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
 
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
15 + 5 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
LED Saving Solutions