Simply Green News and Entertainment

Business Tax Incentives Shine For LED Lighting


Pete Musser - Contributing Writer
Posted on Friday 2nd October 2009

New technologies are making it possible for commercial businesses to reduce energy consumption and lessen their environmental footprint. Many U.S. companies are taking advantage of tax incentives for projects that have major impact on energy reduction such as LED lighting retrofits, which can cut electricity costs by 80 percent.

The federal Energy Policy Act of 2005 offers tax incentives to energy-efficient commercial buildings. Any building that can cut its lighting power density by 25-50 percent is eligible to receive a tax reduction of 60 cents per square foot.

By converting to LED bulbs, companies can reduce their light electric output by 80 percent. Not only do LED users see immediate reductions in their energy bills, they also receive government endorsed tax incentives for making their buildings more energy efficient.

The change to LED lighting also eases buildings’ impact on the environment. Aside from reducing the amount of electricity used, updating bulbs has a not so obvious impact on CO2 emissions. Over 65 percent of American electricity is produced from burning coal. It is estimated that for every $1 of electricity you save, you reduce carbon discharge by 8 pounds.

An LED lighting retrofit and financing provider in the Philadelphia area has taken this new technology a step further and created a lending program for commercial businesses looking to make the switch. LED Saving Solutions has a comprehensive lending program that allows companies to reap the benefits of this new lighting technology without ever seeing an initial capital outlay or an increase in their net operating cost. The program is cash flow positive from the very first month.

“We have recently established some ground-breaking international production and financing relationships that reduce up-front costs to $0 for property owners,” says Charlie Szoradi, president of LED Saving Solutions. “We literally take all of the risk of replacing the bulbs, and we only get paid on a portion of the savings results each month.”

Case studies help to illustrate the value. A major east coast hotel with significant convention and meeting rooms had a run rate of just over 5 million kilowatt hours (kWh) per year for its lighting. The annualized lighting cost for 2009 is $492,000 and with deregulation in 2010 the cost could increase to over $690,000. With the new LED lighting retrofit, the electricity consumption will drop to just over 665,000 kWh. The cost for 2010 will be just under $90,000. That is an annual savings of $600,000. For a million square feet, the $.60 per square feet tax deduction adds up to another $600,000. In a 33 percent tax bracket, the net to bottom line savings are $200,000.

Since the Led Saving Solutions finance team is structuring the loan, the hotel will have a zero up-front expense and they will put money in their pocket every month for years to come and get a great bonus at tax time.

Users of LED lighting simultaneously increase their financial savings and decrease negative impact on the environment. The benefits are obvious, and it is only a matter of time before people realize the significance of that light above their head.

Posted on 5 October 2009 - 11:42am by Guest.
2
Tax incentives are not specific to LED lighting, but are for energy savings. People looking to take advantage of these incentives should review all of their options including fluorescent, compact fluorescent, and LED. LED lighting is great if used in the right application, but is not a universal best choice.
Posted on 5 October 2009 - 11:43am by PatG.
2
Since some of the best LED technology out there is approaching the efficacy of compact fluorescent lamps, then I cannot see how, at this point, except for promotional hipe, energy savings greater than 70% to 75% is possible using LED lamps without a reduction in usable light levels.
This means to me that if a client were to retrofit using fluorescent lamp technology that the energy savings between the LED technology and fluorescent technology would be similar except, based on my experience, the retrofit cost would be lower for the fluorescent solution.
Please correct me if I have misinterpreted your information and the basis of your comparison.
Posted on 5 October 2009 - 1:39pm by Guest.
LED and fluorescent bulbs are comparable in watts used, but they are not interchangeable. For one, the light emitting diode bulbs last 5 to 6 times longer than fluorescent counterparts. This translates into a significant increase in operating cost for the consumer, in terms of more frequent maintenance and installation. Fluorescent bulbs are also more fragile, perform poorly in cold climates, and are almost impossible to recycle.
Although the up front cost of the LED fixtures is more, the consumer will see a greater return on investment overall. If the business or complex is serious about saving money on electricity, they would go with the LEDs, but you're right it is not for everyone. Either way, a company that converts is making strides to save money and the environment.
In terms of usable light levels, there is little difference between the new energy efficient versions and the incandescent, however, there is a substantial heat reduction with the newer models. That translates into an indirect reduction on your air conditioning bill in summer months.
Posted on 19 March 2010 - 12:43am by oracle certification dumps.
2
New technologies are making it possible for commercial businesses to reduce energy consumption and lessen their environmental footprint. Many U.S. companies are taking advantage of tax incentives for projects that have major impact on energy reduction such as LED lighting retrofits, which can cut electricity costs by 80 percent.
Posted on 19 March 2010 - 12:44am by bicsi rcdd.
The federal Energy Policy Act of 2005 offers tax incentives to energy-efficient commercial buildings. Any building that can cut its lighting power density by 25-50 percent is eligible to receive a tax reduction of 60 cents per square foot.
By converting to LED bulbs, companies can reduce their light electric output by 80 percent. Not only do LED users see immediate reductions in their energy bills, they also receive government endorsed tax incentives for making their buildings more energy efficient.
Posted on 19 March 2010 - 12:45am by scjp dumps.
The change to LED lighting also eases buildings’ impact on the environment. Aside from reducing the amount of electricity used, updating bulbs has a not so obvious impact on CO2 emissions. Over 65 percent of American electricity is produced from burning coal. It is estimated that for every $1 of electricity you save, you reduce carbon discharge by 8 pounds.
Posted on 19 March 2010 - 12:47am by scwcd.
An LED lighting retrofit and financing provider in the Philadelphia area has taken this new technology a step further and created a lending program for commercial businesses looking to make the switch. LED Saving Solutions has a comprehensive lending program that allows companies to reap the benefits of this new lighting technology without ever seeing an initial capital outlay or an increase in their net operating cost. The program is cash flow positive from the very first month.

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
 
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
  _____   ____    _      __   __  _   _   _     
| ___| / ___| | | \ \ / / | \ | | | |
| |_ \___ \ | | \ V / | \| | | |
| _| ___) | | |___ | | | |\ | | |___
|_| |____/ |_____| |_| |_| \_| |_____|
Enter the code depicted in ASCII art style.
LED Saving Solutions