Simply Green News and Entertainment

Greening Commercial Buildings Makes ‘Solid Business Sense,’ Report Says


GREENandSAVE Staff
Posted on Wednesday 18th November 2009

Cutting energy consumption stands as a lucrative opportunity for the commercial real estate market, according to a report just announced by KPMG LLC. It is possible to reduce energy use by 30-50 percent in commercial buildings, providing a positive return on investments, KPMG found.

KMPG released its report, Climate Change: Risks & Opportunities in the Canadian Commercial Real Estate Market, just days ahead of TowardsNET-ZERO, a global forum for cutting carbon emissions in buildings to be held in London on Friday, Nov. 20. The conference is coming to Washington, D.C., and San Francisco in 2010.

Phil Ludvigsen, Director of Carbon Advisory Services at KPMG attested to the benefits of looking to energy for cost cutting, including easier facility zoning and permitting, reduced tax burdens, and potentially lower insurance premiums. Reducing power demand also lessens direct and indirect greenhouse gas emissions generated by commercial buildings, he said. Pollution is created from the on-site combustion of fuels for heating and cooling, the use of refrigerants, which are powerful greenhouse gasses, and fuel combustion related to producing construction materials and electricity used in the buildings.

"Going green is not just good for the environment, but can also make solid business sense," Ludvigsen said.

Ludvigsen opined that commercial property will increasingly be bought and sold within a low-carbon economy. Large commercial real estate holdings should have a carbon management strategy in place to assess a carbon footprint, he said. Reducing and managing energy consumption will help to attract the best deals and investors and retain key tenants.

The U.S. EPA’s ENERGY STAR Building Upgrade Manual recommends upgrading buildings in steps, beginning with lighting and supplemental loads. Following lighting and equipment and appliance power changes, assessments should continue with the building envelope, then controls, then heat exchange equipment, and finally heating and cooling systems. According to ENERGY STAR, lighting and other appliances generate a significant amount of heat. The downstream savings of lighting efficiency measures can therefore include cost savings in facility HVAC operation and energy use.

Small and large businesses and universities are taking advantage of the savings and return on investment building retrofits have to offer. For example, large companies such as Dole, Walmart, Holiday Inn, New York Times, Arby’s, and SunGard have reduced costs by installing energy efficient lighting in their buildings. A family-owned Pennsylvania pet store expects to save $200,000 in electricity costs as a result of a lighting upgrade. One private company, LED Saving Solutionsis in the business of making energy efficiency possible and has forged production and financial partnerships that allow it to take on the initial cost of replacing conventional lighting, making the retrofit cash-flow positive for properties from the start.

Posted on 24 November 2009 - 11:28am by Larry G. DeVries.
I would like to see a more standardized reporting method on savings claims for so-called Green projects.
For example, in the above story it is not clear how $200,000 in electricity costs savings are computed. What discounted cash flow (interest rate of return) is used? Certainly a dollar saved in year 10 of operation cannot be considered the same as a dollar saved in year 1. At least not with normal rules of total cost of ownership & life cycle cost calculations.
If the savings amount could be followed by the discounted cash flow interest rate of return and number of years of the project cash flow the reader would be informed about how project savings are claimed.
Posted on 30 January 2010 - 6:17am by Guest.
Certainly a dollar saved in year 10 of operation cannot be considered the same as a dollar saved in year 1. At least not with normal rules of total cost of ownership & life cycle cost calculations.
masters degree program | associate degree program | doctorate degree program | bachelors degree program | high school diploma program
Posted on 19 March 2010 - 1:00am by mcp.
Commercial buildings are a major source of both direct and indirect greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. Direct GHG emissions come from the on-site combustion of fuels for heating and cooling, as well as from the use of refrigerants, which are powerful greenhouse gasses. Indirect emissions come primarily from the GHGs released from fuel combustion related to producing construction materials and electricity used in the buildings.
Posted on 19 March 2010 - 1:01am by ase practice test.
3
"Going green is not just good for the environment, but can also make solid business sense," said Phil Ludvigsen, Director, Carbon Advisory Services, KPMG LLP. "Advantages include easier facility zoning and permitting, reduced tax burdens, and potentially lower insurance premiums. Add to this of course, the knowledge that going green is good for the planet."
Posted on 19 March 2010 - 1:02am by cissp braindump.
2
Commercial real estate groups should realize that the economics are becoming even more compelling, particularly since a Canadian national market for carbon offsets related to building efficiency is on the horizon. Before this happens, forward-thinking companies will have long-term real estate agreements in place addressing development, ownership, and sale of all environmental attributes accrued from their commercial property.
Posted on 18 May 2010 - 2:42am by Designer Radiators.
Green energy is not just about saving and or making money. It is about saving the planet and or increasing the potential life of the planet to enable its inhabitants, which happens to included human beings, to live in an environment that is healthy and free. The long term effect of greenhouse emissions is well known and does not need to be discussed, but the cost of changing our methods, processes and attitudes still require ongoing discussion and an ultimate agreement reached to allow what must be done without money being a consideration. There was a song that you may recall" Can't Buy Me Love" Well may be we should be saying "Cant Buy Me Health" and mean it.

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
 
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
  _   _   ____    ___    ____  __     __   ___  
| | | | | _ \ |_ _| / ___| \ \ / / / _ \
| | | | | |_) | | | | | _ \ \ / / | | | |
| |_| | | __/ | | | |_| | \ V / | |_| |
\___/ |_| |___| \____| \_/ \__\_\
Enter the code depicted in ASCII art style.
LED Saving Solutions