"No Evidence Of Any Deliberate Scientific Malpractice"
- Saving Endangered Ecosystems in a Warming World
- Major Clothing Retailers Join NRDC in Cleaning up Chinese Textile Mills
- Tanganyika Lake is Heating Up Fast Due to Global Warming
- Mississippi River Brimming with Dead Fish Near Gulf of Mexico
- Putting The Escaped Ice Island In Perspective
- Who is leading the LED Tube Revolution?
- Finalist for NYC EBie Awards include LED tube retrofit
- R.I.P Steve Jobs
- PA State Legislator Taking Steps to Save Energy
- Leilani Returns to Racing: New Partnership Brings Together Racing, Veterans for Clean Energy
- Who will lead the LED Tube Revolution?
- NEW: 10 Year Warranty on LED tubes that are Made in America
- American Made LED Tube meets DLC Listing for LED Rebates
- Grey Energy and NET CO2 Savings on LED Tubes
- 2013 International Class A-10 LED Tube Standards
Investigators, led by geologist and energy industry veteran Ronald Oxburgh and hired by East Anglia University - the university that housed the scientists' Climate Research Unit - published their report on Wednesday. Its conclusion was clear:
We saw no evidence of any deliberate scientific malpractice. Rather, we found a small group of dedicated, if slightly disorganized, researchers. We found them to be objective and dispassionate and there was no hint of tailoring results to a particular agenda.
The scientists were first cleared of wrongdoing by the House of Commons Science and Technology Committee, and a third investigation, organized by the British police, is expected to end sometime in May.
For analysis, read Andy Revkin.
Speaking of clearing scientists of wrongdoing: An investigation into the American climate scientist that worked most closely with the Climate Research Unit found no evidence that he did any wrong either.
Speaking of the climate change debate: Here's a metaphor we love.
And, if you like what you're reading: Sign up for the GREENandSAVE Monthly Newsletter - stories, tips, and discounts, direct to your inbox.